Emergency Management – 96 Hour Plan
With respect to the 96-hour plan, are organizations expected to remain sustainable for that period of time?
Any examples are for illustrative purposes only.Ìý
Health care organizations are not required to remain fully functional for 96-hours. Nor are they required to stock-pile supplies. They are required to develop an operational plan for 96-hour duration to fully understand capabilities and limitations in order to make effective decisions when under emergency conditions in an organized and prioritized manner.
Ìý
Decisions would include, but not be limited, to maintaining emergency services, progressive curtailment of activities, stopping elective/non-emergency services, transfer of patients, evacuation of the facility, or returning to normal operations. Ìý
High priority incidents identified in the hazard vulnerability analysis are the issues to be considered in the 96-hour sustainability analysis. Issues include but are not limited to the anticipated actions, emergency supply inventory, access to emergency supplies, and emergency services based upon the assessment process. Exercises should be used to validate or adjust the sustainability plan. Ìý
For example, a hospital with a 72-hour supply of potable water at full capacity. ÌýConsideration of reducing patient load by early discharge and halting elective procedures, could reduce water demand by approximately 50%, thereby extending the hospitals potable water supply to 96 hours. ÌýThe intent is to have a plan to stretch the supply on hand or to activate a Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) to receive more supplies, or a combination of both actions.Ìý
If any of the organization's controlling authorities, such as a local, state, region or federal charter requires the organization to remain open for a specified period, then the organization is expected to comply.Ìý
Reference EM.12.02.09 EP3.Ìý
Health care organizations are not required to remain fully functional for 96-hours. Nor are they required to stock-pile supplies. They are required to develop an operational plan for 96-hour duration to fully understand capabilities and limitations in order to make effective decisions when under emergency conditions in an organized and prioritized manner.
Ìý
Decisions would include, but not be limited, to maintaining emergency services, progressive curtailment of activities, stopping elective/non-emergency services, transfer of patients, evacuation of the facility, or returning to normal operations. Ìý
High priority incidents identified in the hazard vulnerability analysis are the issues to be considered in the 96-hour sustainability analysis. Issues include but are not limited to the anticipated actions, emergency supply inventory, access to emergency supplies, and emergency services based upon the assessment process. Exercises should be used to validate or adjust the sustainability plan. Ìý
For example, a hospital with a 72-hour supply of potable water at full capacity. ÌýConsideration of reducing patient load by early discharge and halting elective procedures, could reduce water demand by approximately 50%, thereby extending the hospitals potable water supply to 96 hours. ÌýThe intent is to have a plan to stretch the supply on hand or to activate a Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) to receive more supplies, or a combination of both actions.Ìý
If any of the organization's controlling authorities, such as a local, state, region or federal charter requires the organization to remain open for a specified period, then the organization is expected to comply.Ìý
Reference EM.12.02.09 EP3.Ìý
Manual:
Hospital and Hospital Clinics
Chapter:
Emergency Management EM
New or updated requirements last added: June 13, 2022.
New or updated requirements may be based on revisions to current accreditation requirements, regulatory changes, and/or an updated interpretation in response to industry changes. Substantive changes to accreditation requirements are also published in the Perspective Newsletter that is available to all Joint Commission accredited organizations.
Last reviewed by Standards Interpretation: June 13, 2022
Represents the most recent date that the FAQ was reviewed (e.g. annual review).
First published date: June 13, 2022
This Standards FAQ was first published on this date.
This page was last updated on June 13, 2022
with update notes of: Reflects new or updated requirements
Types of changes and an explanation of change type:
Editorial changes only: Format changes only. No changes to content. |
Review only, FAQ is current: Periodic review completed, no changes to content. |
Reflects new or updated requirements: Changes represent new or revised requirements.